@Seeker1 I have no idea why you are still on this thread. It’s obvious you have lost all credibility through your outrageous obvious lies and your petty attempts to insult and bully people. If as you say you are really the mother of LK, then you are two peas in a Pod right down to compulsive disastrous nonstop SM addiction.
There is no proof of Let Ruth Do It but there is testimony, sworn testimony in front of a jury of Finish The Bastard. There is no proof of Let’s Get Rid Of Her but even if it was said that doesn’t imply murder and nor does Let Ruth Do It.
Of course LK would thinkbit does IF those words were spoken because that makes her seem more important in her mind.
Newsflash: she’s not.
As to what civil trials are for - gee thanks. I guess I dreamed working in civil court for 14 + years ending as the civil motion clerk. I had no idea.
And I have no doubt the jury believed LK caused the mental break just as people do here and even better as evidenced by the public at large as evidenced by both YouTube and Law & Crime commenters.
It has to bother you and your ilk that without fail 95% of the people here and commenting on the internet lay the blame entirely at LKs feet.
Just about everyone knows it. Just about everyone sees it.
Trying to divert attention to Vera or MHG is nothing more than a ruse to get attention and blame off of where it entirely belongs: with LK and everyone knows it.
Everyone knows it. Even you.
Edit to add: maybe LK should be suspended. That’s my vote.
Suppose for the sake of argument that the tapes are as damning as LK or Seeker suggests, and were introduced.
Do you think the verdict would have been “guilty” instead of NGRI?
Since the defense made its case on insanity, I think the verdict would have been NGRI on two counts, NG on trial counts, exactly the same, with or without tapes. Therefore, zero marginal value to the prosecution.
If the defense had not made its case on insanity, I think the verdict would have been two counts of guilty and two counts of not guilty, exactly the same, with or without the tapes. Therefore, zero marginal value to the prosecution.
that’s more supposition than I can handle for making a guess as to what the jury might think.
You might as well ask, “what if a choir of angels appeared in the sky over the courthouse and sang a chorus of Roger Miller’s ‘Dang Me’? What would the jury do then?”
If those tapes were damning at all, it would go a long, long way to prove that MB did, in fact, know the difference between right and wrong, was able to formulate intent, and did understand the nature and consequences of his actions and was not, in fact, legally insane.
Yes that’s the most likely scenario actually. We had a long time poster here maintaining two different accounts with 2 different personalities who was quite abusive in one. They were busted when they finally mixed up their identites and banned.
michael is the hornets nest and has been for years. Some of his ex students/workers told me they were bullied, manipulated, threatened, etc by him on numerous occasions. Someone told me that they felt bad for Lauren and wish she had warned us. She said that she herself felt lucky to get out of there alive. Lauren has her faults… but Michael TRIED TO KILL SOMEONE WITH A DEADLY WEAPON!!!
I’m not “trying to divert” attention to MHG. I think MB was horribly stressed by threats that MHG would leave him if he did not “get rid” of LK, while he was reluctant to evict her and lose the income. If MHG was threatening to dump him, I can imagine horrible regret at leaving his wife for MHG.
I most certainly don’t believe 100% of the blame for MBs mental breakdown rests with LK!
Why do you imagine you “have a vote” on whether LK gets suspended? (Suspended from USEF?)
Is that what the ongoing purpose of this thread is? To try to influence the outcome of the MHG/MB complaint to USEF?
"I think there’s a subtext in all the posting from the Kanareks and their alters/supports, and that’s that the ‘bashing’; ie reporting on LK and RG’s actual behavior, actual SM posting and sworn testimony, somehow is the CAUSE of the behavior, not a reaction to the behavior.
For example:
COTH poster: Here’s an example of LK being horrible to someone.
Kanareks: But you’re being horrible to her posting that. That’s just as bad! SM bullying is awful and it’s awful to read this stuff. (With absolutely no sense of irony whatsoever.)
It’s not bad when Lauren does it because you all repeat it when you call her out on it.
Part of this subtext is how awful the threads on COTH are, and they’ve going on for years, and that has somehow influenced public perception of Lauren.
That doesn’t hold up. The great thing about all the comments on YouTube (ETA: and Law & Crime) is that the people watching the YouTube coverage of the trial are mostly NOT horse people and have never heard of COTH.
They arrived at their similar opinion of Lauren and Rob just by watching the testimony and reading Lauren’s posts in the comments.
So for the last time: It’s Lauren’s actions and behavior that have caused her to viewed as an unhinged, vengeful lunatic, not anyone on COTH’s pointing out that she’s an unhinged, vengeful lunatic.
Maybe bookmark this post and re-quote it anytime one of the sock puppets claims it’s all our fault because we’re mean to Lauren on the internet."
MICHAEL BARISONE TRIED TO KILL TWO PEOPLE WITH A DEADLY WEAPON. Posting stupid crap on social media can be bad… but not even close to putting someone in a hospital coding twice using a gun.