Kind of a pet peeve, but the word some folks are trying to use is “vicious”, NOT “viscous” or some other mispelling. Not trying to pick on anyone, several folks have done this.
Carry on.
Kind of a pet peeve, but the word some folks are trying to use is “vicious”, NOT “viscous” or some other mispelling. Not trying to pick on anyone, several folks have done this.
Carry on.
Thank you! I get those wrong all the time. Spell check goes with it…
Yes. Here is some of the conversation I was referring to. I never suspected sabotage though. That was others. Barisone Verdict Is In: Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
Kind of a pet peeve, but the word some folks are trying to use is “vicious”, NOT “viscous” or some other mispelling. Not trying to pick on anyone, several folks have done this.
Carry on.
I am with you 100%!
The fire inspection guy was going to notify MB by email the next morning about the problems/problems solved at the farm house, but did not do so that morning nor that afternoon.
LK sent him pictures and videos of the fixed smoke detector(s) and he let them know the issue had been abated, is that the correct word?
MB was never notified before the shooting that the farm house was not an issue any longer. Another SO, he may not have thought anyone would be at the farm house.
It’s plausible.
Yes, it is very plausible.
I thought one of the inspector people said they were going to go back out the next day. The Fire Marshall definitely testified he didn’t notify anyone that LK and RG had been allowed to stay in the house, which I find flabbergasting.
The Fire Marshall definitely testified he didn’t notify anyone that LK and RG had been allowed to stay in the house, which I find flabbergasting.
At least he looked uncomfortable about it, as I recall.
Especially since Shellworth asked all those stupid questions about the photos, of horses, in a horse training facility.
And how many times did he have to ask what “dressage” was?
MB was never notified before the shooting that the farm house was not an issue any longer. Another SO, he may not have thought anyone would be at the farm house.
And in that case, may have relaxed his vigil of the farm allowing ninjas to sneak in and access the office now that the way was clear.
Fire guy said he was not going to go back out that night to check it out. Was “not” going to go back out that late at night.
Fire guy said he was not going to go back out that night to check it out. Was “not” going to go back out that late at night
Right! That’s why he agreed to the video (sigh). (That would never fly in my world) But I thought someone said they were going to go back out the next day.
And I could be completely wrong. If I have time tonight I’ll go watch to him and the nice health inspector lady again.
I wonder if that inspector was given a harsh rebuke or possibly lost his job with his failure to follow procedures? Morris County, NJ…a small area in NJ where training is lacking and procedures are not followed. Live there at your peril! /s
Please double check me, but my memory seems to recall that he said he would notify MB the next day. I don’t think he said he was going to return to the property. Seems he also said he did not have MB’s contact information.
My last sentence give me pause, because you know public records. And HOW hard would it be to get the owners information, really.
It seems to me that this would be part of his job. But by todays standards, I guess you don’t have to do a complete job. Partial is A-ok.
you mean like the police who did such a wonderful job collecting evidence? At least one of those guys received a promotion after the shooting.
:/s
It seems to me that this would be part of his job. But by todays standards, I guess you don’t have to do a complete job. Partial is A-ok.
Gov’t protects its corruption and incompetence. God forbid the citizens expect the services they pay for.
Please double check me, but my memory seems to recall that he said he would notify MB the next day. I don’t think he said he was going to return to the property. Seems he also said he did not have MB’s contact information.
My last sentence give me pause, because you know public records. And HOW hard would it be to get the owners information, really.
It seems to me that this would be part of his job. But by todays standards, I guess you don’t have to do a complete job. Partial is A-ok.
I’ll see what I can find.
I just remember thinking, there is no way a video from me, a property owner, would fly with the inspectors I know. I may have misheard.
(Glad we are on the same page with the propane tank/heat situation)
CurrentlyHorseless:In and case, if I tag a poster who has stated they have me on ignore, I’ve been assuming that they will not be notified.
I’m hundreds of posts behind here but I just had to ask -!f you believe a poster has you on ignore, then why on earth would you tag them, other than tj be annoying? In fact why tag anyone unless you are expecting a direct response from them?
That’s what I asked TL. Why repeatedly tag IM and Seeker if they haven’t posted in months?
I thought you preferred not being tagged, and have attempted to not tag you, when I remember. Is that still your preference?
And he needed to be carrying a gun to check the house for needed repairs? Needed repairs that the building department just enumerated for him?
So you’re saying it’s plausible he isn’t the one who brought the gun to the scene at all. Glad you are finally starting to get it!
CurrentlyHorseless:And he needed to be carrying a gun to check the house for needed repairs? Needed repairs that the building department just enumerated for him?
So you’re saying it’s plausible he isn’t the one who brought the gun to the scene at all. Glad you are finally starting to get it!
BigMama, I asked if it was still your preference that I not tag you. I thought that was the preference that you stated, but maybe it was someone else.
For my part, I prefer you not misconstrue a rhetorical question to misrepresent what I’ve said. Do you think you’re being clever? Having to come back and state, no, obviously that was a rhetorical question is tiresome.
eggbutt:While skimming the 48 Hours episode last night, I noticed again how Schellhorn always, always looked to the left and was shifty, never looking the camera or interviewer in the eye. Bikinkas and Deininger looked straight into the camera and spoke completely relaxed. It was clear, to me at least, Schellhorn didn’t want to be there.
I meant to reply to this earlier. I can easily imagine that his appearance on 48 Hours presented a bit of a moral dilemma for Schellhorn. On one hand, if the show painted a favorable portrait of him, it could play very, very well for his future aspirations. But if on the other hand he came off in an unfavorable light, it could sow doubt in the minds of the viewers as to whether the outcome of the trial was just. Schellhorn may have also been worried the show might highlight the fact that he based his case on the word of two drug addict grifters and admitted liars with multiple criminal charges and spotty (or no) verifiable work history. I also wonder if his appearance was mandated by the DA office’s public relations team, or perhaps by his boss. At any rate, he certainly did not seem at ease being interviewed for the show.
It’s possible the actual interviewer was sitting off to the left of the camera. In general the camera man and interviewer are separate jobs.
MB and Rosie were well familiar with each other by then.
And you know this how?