MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[eggbutt]

Hey @Inigo-montoya, aka Jonathan Kanarek and @Seeker1, aka Kirby Kanarek, I WAS RIGHT THE ENTIRE TIME!!! Now, take your lies and deflection and SHOVE THEM!!!

[Sdel]

At this rate we’ll get to see the whole show before it airs….

Kind of like how we saw the whole trial before it happened…

[trubandloki]

I am still waiting for @CurrentlyHorseless to comment on the ID of their favorite poster who they claimed never lied and is always right.

[ekat]

Thank goodness for all that QFP’ng done. Because, here, on the day of the verdict, once again JK/IM said Lauren could see a scenario where she would train with him again, which is kind of the opposite of the suit. Not really a good look for Dad.

Thanks to @trubandloki for preserving this one.

[trubandloki]

Oh yes, and then later on he edited that part out, all while insisting he does not edit posts. I remember that.

[Knights_Mom]

@DreadPirateRoberts

It was clear all along that the IM on this forum bore more intellectual resemblance to Vizzini, the overconfident bully, than a skilled swordsman. But seeing his smug face in the preview video only makes it more clear that he must have been confused about who was who in Florinthian history when he chose his screen name. Vizzini is a much closer fit all around.

JK told us so many times, in so many vile ways, exactly who he was … seems he himself is the only one who is confused about his identity.

As for why he’d blather on online, seems the whole clan misperceived their collective pigeon-level chess game as such high level mastery that the rest of the world is nothing but pawns. But like Vizzini, they were sorely mistaken about what the classic blunders are. It’s not “never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line”, it’s, “never go in against vacuumers, elderly mobsters in bathrobes, or pirates when your thin veneer of intellect, your family’s (dubious) honor, or your shady legal actions are on the line.”

OMG I love this

[ekat]

@trubandloki

Oh yes, and then later on he edited that part out, all while insisting he does not edit posts. I remember that.

One other interesting note from that post. Inigo-Montoya put out there the implication that Jonathan Kanarek wanted to talk about the recordings during the criminal trial but Mr Bilinkas was afraid and did not want to go there. So, I’m curious what JK/IM’s hesitation in turning over stuff now is?

Edit to correct Bilinkas

[Knights_Mom]

@BigMama1

It is rather amusing that after LK threatening posters here that their identities were going to be revealed via subpoenas to COTH, the ones unveiled are simply her and her bizarro parents

I find this part exceptionally ironic and hysterical myself

[Graymaresrule]

I thought the Mods said JK was not IM. Has IM been banned?

[Warmblood1]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

It looks like there is a Kanarek ally posting in the comments, declaring Michael is a liar. There is another person who has commented on the other 48 Hours trailers for the episode, and she also seems to be an LK defender, approaching it from the “Nobody deserves to be shot” angle.

If it’s someone calling MB a murderer in comments then it’s definitely someone affiliated with the K family because no other sane beings refer to him that way.

[Ghazzu]

@Knights_Mom

My friends husband went to vet school in the Caribbean because he started that path when he was older, close to 30. Turned out to be a fine vet.

I have personally visited Ross, which is on St. Kitts, and was impressed with the school. I know several graduates.
A former student of mine went to St. George in Grenada, did an ECC residency at Tufts, and is now a boarded emergency and critical care DVM.
Both schools are AVMA accredited, and all their grads must pass the NAVLE.

[skydy]

This post from InigoMontoya on this thread;Barisone Trial This Month

“It would depend….obviously it’s a growing field of law. Even within Facebook private messages might be treated differently than public posts.”
" As for a public forum like COTH there’s certainly no requirement to be truthful….or at least no penalty under the law for intentional misstatements."
" If I’m drafting a complaint I’d be careful to start every allegation with “upon information and belief” whether it was something I read or something my client posted."
" I just think it’s wise not to make allegations or draw conclusions about statements not made under oath."

[Knights_Mom]

@BigMama1

@Sdel

I had wondered at the time if RC might have been attempting to look for her missing gun. JK and LK asserted she was trying to plant evidence to further some plot. Considering all the projection that has gone on…

Did Lauren post her comments about a “missing” gun on the farm before or after the shooting? I always wondered how she would know a gun was missing…

Yes a missing Ruger.

[eggbutt]

@Graymaresrule

I thought the Mods said JK was not IM. Has IM been banned?

I don’t know of any reason either IM or Seeker should be banned.

[skydy]

No not banned. Inigo Montoya has been on COTH as of 3 minutes ago.

[Scribbler]

@Knights_Mom

@BigMama1

@Sdel

I had wondered at the time if RC might have been attempting to look for her missing gun. JK and LK asserted she was trying to plant evidence to further some plot. Considering all the projection that has gone on…

Did Lauren post her comments about a “missing” gun on the farm before or after the shooting? I always wondered how she would know a gun was missing…

Yes a missing Ruger.

I’ve often thought LK was scouting and keeping tabs on RCs gun maybe for multiple visits and when it went into the safe LK either didn’t know where it went or wanted to create a narrative that MB stole it out of the truck. Or that LK wanted to disappear the gun to claim it was missing, then use that for a call to SS.

[eggbutt]

So has Seeker1

[skydy]

@eggbutt

So has Seeker1

It’s very weird IMO.

[eggbutt]

Well they need to see what people are saying about 48 Hours and Silver’s brilliant filing to determine a narrative that makes any sense at all.

[LilRanger]

@ekat

One other interesting note from that post. Inigo-Montoya put out there the implication that Jonathan Kanarek wanted to talk about the recordings during the criminal trial but Mr Nilinkas was afraid and did not want to go there. So, I’m curious what JK/IM’s hesitation in turning over stuff now is?

Projection! All that tough talk and then he’s called on the carpet, Nd JK is all like, subpoena? What’s that? I don’t have anything remotely relevant to this case! Plus I’m old and dottery!