This is an interesting point that I had not thought of, thank you for bringing it up.
They were not just being rude and invasive and attempting to ruin their future civil case, they were being the only thing the Kanarek family seems to know how to do, scheming.
I can not be the only one who imagines living life that way would be exhausting. Darn, wouldn’t it be easier just to earn a real income? Even at her advanced age I would bet that Lauren Kanarek could make a good living doing what she did for a living in her 20s.
Finally there is a perfect possible explanation why CH and HH behave as they do! They want us to be crystal clear to anyone lured to this forum how awful the Kanareks are!
Thank you @trubandloki for pointing out they may actually be wearing robes under their jogging suits after all!
I can so picture a conversation between Lauren Kanarek and someone willing to talk to her going something like this.
“Oh high (giggle, hi for the rest of us), so nice to see you again. I do not consent to being recorded. Did you see the last horse go? Wasn’t their test amazing? And the weather today is just so perfect for the horses and riders. I do not consent to being recorded. Have you tried the club sandwiches they have at the food tent? They are amazing. I highly recommend them. I do not consent to being recorded.”
I wish to gloat for a few minutes. The last two screen shots (Mr. Silver’s pleading) about SafeSport and child services.
2019:
2020:
Then scrolling down in the 2020 thread there is a lot of blather from someone who is no longer a member about how Lauren Kanarek couldn’t possibly have been involved with SS summoning child protective services.
Not to continue the political aspect - but Trump was a named defendant in that NY case. In the LK/MB/SGF/RC case, neither JK or KK are named defendants. Can those sorts of fines be levied against a third party who isn’t either plaintiff or defendant in a case? IOW, if the requests for contempt of court orders against JK/KK are granted by Weaver, what are the likely fines that may be levied against them? I assume they will be nowhere near that $110,000 amount, but will they be enough to make the K’s start cooperating a bit more with discovery? Or would they be just a “slap on the wrist”?
Anyone in violation of a court order can be charged with contempt for violating said order. They don’t need to be a plaintiff or defendant though they could be. I googled for examples this is the 1st that popped up.
I am not personally invested, therefore I don’t know why you would think I would be “gutted” by anything.
I have stated before that I think the jury’s verdict was reasonable, and that given the dearth of evidence and the impeachment issues, I would not personally have been able to find him guilty. But I do think the trial painted a pretty clear picture of a tormented man who was driven to a mental break, so I understand the verdict reached.
And no, it isn’t clear that Lauren was planning to leave. It’s clear she was told she needed to. And that she was told she was being evicted.
Thanks, that is what I thought. I am curious though about how punitive the fines might be for JK/KK should they be determined to be in contempt. Maybe some miniscule amount like $1000@? Or could they be more substantial?
That is an interesting question @MHM. With so much evidence in their favor, I am sure the legal team will spend quite a bit of time deciding which is best evidence to make their point.
I agree that overwhelming the jury with all the evidence would not be a positve.
I’m guessing the dressage event where they accosted Mr. Tarshis is probably an annual occurrence. I wonder if people will turn and run from the K clan if they turn up at the next one.